THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS

[The peer-review process of Ajasraa Sanskrit Journal can be broadly summarized into 11 steps]

Step-1: Submission of Paper

The corresponding or submitting author submits the paper to the journal through E-mail.
Step-2 : Editorial Assessment

The journal checks the paper's composition and arrangement against the journal's Author Guidelines to make sure the quality of the research paper. It includes the required sections and stylizations. The actual quality of the paper is not assessed at this point.
Step-3: Appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief

The EIC checks that the paper is appropriate for the journal and is sufficiently original and inventive. If not, the paper may be rejected without being reviewed any further.
Step-4: Editor-in-Chief assigns Editor to handle the peer-review

In this stage, Editor-in-Chief assigns the Editor to handle the peer -review. Here plagiarism is checked with the help of other members of the Editorial Board.
Step-5: Invitation to Reviewers

The handling editor (s) of editorial board send(s) invitations to individuals he or she believes would be appropriate reviewers.
Step-6: Reviewers

The Scholars send the request to reveal their wish to work as the reviewer in the concerned area through the proper format. Final decision will remain to Editorial bord.
Step-7: Response to Invitations

Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. They can accept or decline. If may be reviewers unable to review, they must respond in written way. They might also suggest alternative reviewers.
Step-8: Review is Conducted

The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper several times. The first read is used to form an initial impression of the work. If major problems are found at this stage, the reviewer may feel comfortable rejecting the paper without further work. Otherwise, they will read the paper several more times, taking notes to build a detailed point-by-point review. The review is then submitted to the journal through proper format, with a recommendation to accept or reject it - or else with a request for revision before it is reconsidered.
Step-9: Journal Evaluates the Reviews

The handling editor (s) consider(s) all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer to get an extra opinion before deciding in proper format.
Step-10: The Decision is Communicated

The editor sends a confirmation to the author including any relevant reviewer comments.
Step-11: Declaration

All right has reserved to Editor-in-Chief.

THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS

[The peer-review process of Ajasraa Sanskrit Journal can be broadly summarized into 11 steps]

Step-1: Submission of Paper

The corresponding or submitting author submits the paper to the journal through E-mail.

Step-2 : Editorial Assessment

The journal checks the paper's composition and arrangement against the journal's Author Guidelines to make sure the quality of the research paper. It includes the required sections and stylizations. The actual quality of the paper is not assessed at this point.

Step-3: Appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief

The EIC checks that the paper is appropriate for the journal and is sufficiently original and inventive. If not, the paper may be rejected without being reviewed any further.

Step-4: Editor-in-Chief assigns Editor to handle the peer-review

In this stage, Editor-in-Chief assigns the Editor to handle the peer -review. Here plagiarism is checked with the help of other members of the Editorial Board.

Step-5: Invitation to Reviewers

The handling editor (s) of editorial board send(s) invitations to individuals he or she believes would be appropriate reviewers.

Step-6: Reviewers

The Scholars send the request to reveal their wish to work as the reviewer in the concerned area through the proper format. Final decision will remain to Editorial bord.

Step-7: Response to Invitations

Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. They can accept or decline. If may be reviewers unable to review, they must respond in written way. They might also suggest alternative reviewers.

Step-8: Review is Conducted

Step-9: Journal Evaluates the Reviews

The handling editor (s) consider(s) all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. If the reviews differ widely, the editor may invite an additional reviewer to get an extra opinion before deciding in proper format.

Step-10: The Decision is Communicated

The editor sends a confirmation to the author including any relevant reviewer comments.

Step-11: Declaration

All right has reserved to Editor-in-Chief.